One of the greatest values you can give your divorcing
clients is a set of tools to implement their settlement and agreements.
Think of it this way – if your client (or opposing) is
ordered to refinance the recently-awarded marital residence and include a
buyout to their former spouse, how beneficial would it be if
everyone in the process (clients, attorneys, the court/mediator, children)
knew, in advance, that this would actually happen? What if you knew –
BEFORE FINAL DIVORCE – that they could actually turn white paper (decree) into
green money (buyouts, payoffs)?
In as concise a form as possible – usually less than two
pages – my Assessment
1.
analyzes the situation,
2.
offers brief explanations of how mortgage
finance affects the settlement (and vice versa) and
3.
makes clear recommendations for decree language
and settlements.
As a note to #3, I adhere to the principle of non-interference.
That is, I do not see my role as trying to affect terms of the settlement. I
strongly believe that this is between the parties and their attorneys. My
concern is to accommodate, as much as possible, the agreements that are contemplated.
However, certain features of a settlement will either allow or disallow loan
approval. Therefore, some tweaking is
sometimes called for.
Here’s an example. A wife wishes to be awarded the marital
residence under the proviso that she refinance its mortgage and, thus, relieve
the husband of its credit liability. She needs support income to qualify for this
mortgage. The wife tells me that spousal support is contemplated at $2,000 per
month for two years. Well, one of the mortgage rules is that such income must
continue for 3 or more years after loan closing. So I ask, “can you live with $1,333
per month for 3 years?” If so, all $1,333/month is qualifying income while $0
of the $2,000/month could be counted as her qualifying income (because it does
not extend for 3 years or more after loan closing). There are usually a few
other adjustments to be made but that’s the general idea.
Thus, I have not affected the actual dollar amount that is
to be paid/received; I have simply recommended that it be structured in such a
way as to allow the client to get financing. And, incidentally, the payer benefits
as well when he needs financing – instead of $2,000/month counting against
his debt ratio, now only $1,333 counts against it. It’s almost always a
win-win.
Also, I have to advise regarding (what I call) limits
to financing. That is, while I never tell a party “you should
get this much or they should pay this much,” I do have to
say one of two things
-
“It will take this many dollars to qualify” or
-
“For that amount of support, your loan amount
cannot exceed $X.”
This is all in a concise Assessment. And by the way, the
Assessment is as fluid as a divorce settlement process is. That is, it requires
updating and refinement. This is because everything about a divorce settlement
affects loan approval. That means I have to update the Assessment.
Here’s how you get my dynamic, award-winning, stupendous
(well, pretty important anyway) Assessment
for your case: Tell your client to call
me. Or ask opposing to have their client call me. The one who needs
financing (whether refinancing or purchasing in the foreseeable future) needs
to make that call.
“Hi Noel; my attorney gave me your number” is the beginning
of a dramatically and substantially better settlement with the advantage of my Assessment about
TURNING WHITE PAPER
INTO GREEN MONEY!
No comments:
Post a Comment